
White: Football Team Faces Another 'Defining Moment'
Courtesy: VirginiaSports.com Release: 09/07/2009
By Jeff White
CHARLOTTESVILLE -- For the true freshmen, this is new, the vitriol arising from
Virginia's stunning loss to William and Mary in the season-opener Saturday
night.
The veterans on the team are more accustomed to dealing with criticism.
Many of them were around in 2007 when, on opening day, Virginia lost 23-3 at
Wyoming in a game that wasn't as close as the score suggests.
Then there was the 31-3 loss at Duke last season. That ended the Blue Devils'
25-game skid in ACC play and dropped Virginia's record to 1-3 overall. In those
three losses, UVa had been outscored 128-20, and critics assailed the program
from every direction.
Inside the McCue Center, the team stayed together.
"I think we felt we were better than how we were playing," recalled Steve Greer,
a redshirt freshman who starts at inside linebacker. "We knew we were better,
and we just wanted to kind of come out and show that, and I think we finally did
against Maryland."
Indeed, a week later after the debacle in Durham, the Cavaliers shocked the
Terrapins 31-0 at Scott Stadium. Wins over East Carolina, North Carolina and
Georgia Tech followed, and suddenly the Wahoos led the ACC's Coastal Division.
UVa's ascent, as fans know, abruptly stopped there, and Al Groh's team closed
the season with four straight losses to finish 5-7. But the Cavaliers managed to
achieve mediocrity in a year in which they'd once seemed destined to finish 2-10
or 3-9.
In 2007, they achieved more than mediocrity. After losing at Wyoming, the 'Hoos
ran off seven consecutive victories, and they ended the season in the Gator
Bowl. And so the team's older players are reminding themselves that the loss to
W&M, however disappointing, was only one game.
"There's a lot of guys on this team who have seen the highs and have seen the
lowest of lows," junior quarterback Marc Verica said this afternoon. "That past
experience is something you can rely on in a situation like this. This isn't the
first time we've been in this circumstance where the first game didn't go as
well as we had hoped, and we really only had each other. Everyone was against
us. So this situation is no different.
"I would just tell a lot of people not to forget that one of our best seasons
here was after a pretty devastating loss in Laramie."
If the challenge facing the Cavaliers is greater this season, it's because their
next opponent is 17th-ranked Texas Christian. The teams meet Saturday at 3:30
p.m. at Scott Stadium -- this is TCU's opener -- and Virginia is up against a
program that has won 11 games in four of the past six seasons.
"A very, very strong team," said UVa's ninth-year coach, Al Groh.
His players realize that. Still, their goal is to "bounce back the way we did
last year [after the Duke loss], because that was a pretty defining moment in
our season, how we came back and how we fought through that adversity last
year," Verica said.
"Any time you lose a game as bad as we lost at Wyoming or the other night, all
you can really do, you just got to stick together, and you just gotta trust each
other. You gotta trust your teammates, you gotta trust your coaches and you
gotta trust yourself. Things aren't always going to go as you planned. It's
really just important to have faith in the system, have faith in yourself. You
gotta win that confidence back."
Verica added: "That's the great thing about this game: Week to week, there's
always a chance of redemption. And win or lose, you're going to have to prove
yourself the next week."
In his postgame press conference Saturday night, Groh acknowledged there would
"be a lot of negativity out there, some of it well-deserved."
He talked today, at John Paul Jones Arena, about the approach the coaching staff
takes with the players each year.
"One of the things that we tell them before the season ever starts is a team
collectively and the players individually have to be prepared to handle both the
love and the hate, because both of them come during the course of the season,"
Groh said. "The players and the team ... everybody needs to talk to themselves,
and the team needs to talk to itself, because every week the team is going to
get one or the other.
"Every week. If you're 12 0, the team has to be able to tune out the love. And
if you're 0 12, a team has to be able to tune out the hate. Because either way
that affects how the players think, and all the players can think about is what
they need to do to do their job."
Shotgun Snap An Issue For Cavaliers
Sept. 7, 2009
8:12 p.m.
CHARLOTTESVILLE -- Blocking isn't junior center Jack Shields' only
responsibility in UVa's new spread offense. Every play starts with a shotgun
snap, and Shields' job is to hike the football back cleanly and quickly to the
quarterback.
He was less than perfect Saturday night in Virginia's 24-16 loss to William and
Mary, leaving his coach, Al Groh, less than pleased.
Late in the first quarter, on Jameel Sewell's first play, the senior quarterback
mishandled a Shields snap and had to fall on the ball for a 9-yard loss. Later,
a Shields snap appeared to hit one of his legs and never made it back to
quarterback Vic Hall. A defender pounced on the ball, and the Tribe's ensuing
drive ended with a field goal that cut UVa's lead to 14-13 at halftime.
Asked today at his weekly news conference if shotgun snaps were a concern for
the Cavaliers, Groh said, "I think it's pretty apparent that they are. I think
anybody else in this room can answer that question, too. They had an impact on
the game. They cost us one lost series because it created a second and [19].
"Could the ball have been caught? Yes. Should the ball have been in the bull's
eye? Absolutely. That's the center's job, put the ball in the bull's eye. It's
only going 5 yards. You ought to be able to do it.
"The other ball never really got off the ground. How can that happen? It was as
befuddling to me as it is to you ... It's not as if we are under center
sometimes and [in] shotgun other times. We have been in shotgun since the 27th
of March."
Shields, who's from Duxbury, Mass., started 11 games last season, when the
Cavaliers did not operate exclusively out of the shotgun.
-- Jeff White
Baseball Team Basks In Spotlight's Glow
Sept. 7, 2009
2:18 p.m.
CHARLOTTESVILLE -- It was a weekend to remember for the UVa baseball team.
First, before the football game Saturday night at Scott Stadium, members of the
2009 baseball team raised the Power of Orange flag, to loud applause from the
fans. During a break in the game, Brian O'Connor was among the UVa head coaches
whose 2008-09 feats were recognized.
Then, before the Nationals-Marlins game yesterday in Washington, the 'Hoos were
honored again. A video commemorating Virginia's run to the College World Series
was played at Nationals Park, and the 2009 players were introduced to the crowd.
"That was really great," O'Connor said this morning. "It was nice of the
Nationals to have us up, and it was a nice treat for our players. That was the
first bus trip of the year for the 2010 team."
The afternoon became even more memorable when former UVa great Ryan Zimmerman --
who else? -- gave the Nats a 5-4 win with a two-run home run in the bottom of
the ninth.
"It was amazing," O'Connor said. "His college team is in the stands, and he has
a chance to win the game for his club, and he does ... Ryan's always been a
clutch player, and that's what you talk about to your players all the time."
By the time UVa's season ended in late June, most of the players' fellow
students had long since scattered for the summer. So this weekend was "the first
opportunity we got to publicly acknowledge what our team accomplished," O'Connor
said.
After Zimmerman ended the game with his walkoff homer, he showed the UVa players
around the Nats' clubhouse.
The trip to D.C. "was awesome," UVa sophomore John Hicks said this afternoon at
Davenport Field, "especially after Zim hit the walkoff ... And then when we went
to the locker room, it was just incredible."
Fall practice starts today for UVa, which figures to enter the 2010 season
ranked in the top 10 nationally.
-- Jeff White
Transcript from Al Groh's Weekly Press Conference
Courtesy: VirginiaSports.com Release: 09/07/2009
Courtesy: Jim Daves/UVa Media Relations
Q. It looked like there was a little bit of a rotation at linebacker. Is it the
idea to get Cam (Johnson) a third of the reps or is that just how it worked out?
COACH GROH: Cameron (Johnson) took quite a bit in the game actually. I think he
had 72 plays in the game, which is the most extended - which is clearly the most
extended action he's had on regular down. His play last year was on the dime and
then unfortunately with three or four games to go he broke his ankle and he was
lost for the season.
His number of plays actually last year were not a very high number. Those 72
plays far exceeded his total plays from last year, and he handled it very well.
This is a player who has a very good aptitude for improvement. He takes
instruction very well. He applies it very quickly. He's made very good progress
here through camp and perhaps some of you are able to catch some glimpses of
him, I know it's difficult without having game video to study but if you're able
to catch some glimpses of him, you can see that this is a very talented player
for the position. He did a very nice job, Denzel (Burrell) could probably have
played very clearly played the best but he has played at Virginia, did a real
good job.
Aaron (Clark) has the background as a fifth year player, has the versatility to
play on the right and on the left, and with Denzel and Cameron on both the
regular and the dime defenses, they are in the game all the time unless Aaron
can give them a break. So that's one of Aaron's principal functions is on first
and second down to make sure that we can relieve the load off those other two
players.
Q. I know the depth chart comes out tomorrow. Do you see any significant changes
for the TCU game?
COACH GROH: No.
Q. You mentioned Denzel when guys have interceptions like that and kind of
bobble the ball -- do you want to rip your hair out on the dropped
interceptions?
COACH GROH: During the game, we really try to restrain from all that, throw your
hands up, throw your hat down, stomp around, I maen that type of frustration. It
doesn't do anybody any good.
And it's time to get on to the next play.
But when it happens and in the evaluation of the game, clearly those are lost
opportunities. Those are lost opportunities to have an impact on how the game is
going to turn out. Just as if we throw a pass into the end zone and a player
drops it, that stands out to everybody; oh, wow, those guys had a touchdown pass
dropped. We had those opportunities to change the game with takeaways, they are
big circumstances and as mentioned last night, we had one that it would have
been a good race to see if (Chase) Minnifield could have been kept from the end
zone, on he one he had a chance to intercept and when Denzel had a chance to
intercept, which was a drive that was started in our territory and we could have
killed the drive right there and the drive subsequently ended in three points.
Now you can say the defense did a good job of coming in in difficult
circumstances to keep it from being a touchdown and hold it to a field goal, but
in reality we had our opportunity to turn it into a zero and on the other end we
had an opportunity to turn it into seven.
Right there on those two plays, as we mentioned last night, there was maybe 13
or 14 plays out of 199 that impacted how the game went. And those were two of
them and had we made those plays, could certainly had the potential to be a 10
point swing on the scoreboard with everything else being the same as it was.
Q. Do you give your players any advice about outside chatter?
COACH GROH: Well, one of the things that we tell them before the season ever
starts is a team collectively and the players individually have to be prepared
to handle both the love and the hate, because both of them come during the
course of the season. The players and the team need everybody needs to talk to
themselves and the team needs to talk to itself because every week the team is
going to get one or the other. Every week. If you're 12 0, the team has to be
able to tune out the love. And if you're 0 12, a team has to be able to tune out
the hate. Because either way that affects how the players think and all the
players can think about is what they need to do to do their job.
So you don't start saying that in the locker room after the game or you don't
start saying that the day after the game; you start saying that all year long.
And when players come into the program, they have to begin to learn to
understand that. And so a player hears it most of the time that he's here over
the course of four or five years.
Q. Obviously with turnovers, you can look back and wonder what could have been.
William & Mary also had players behind your secondary and didn't capitalize.
What was happening on those long passes and how easy are those to fix?
COACH GROH: Well, one of them was just a matter of attention on the part of
players involved. The attention given to the pattern was not good enough. The
other one was just a part of the confusion on the part of one player, actually a
play that was practiced during the course of the week when we are in a
combination coverage with a bunch and he made a wrong decision and thought the
other player was taking him. So clearly he know that's on video, other teams are
going to see it and try to create it. When that worked once, there's no reason
to believe the other team wouldn't try it again during the course of the game.
That was addressed immediately after the series. And addressing it is not
enough, we'll give it some turns in practice here too to make sure it's
physically taken care of.
Q. Just wanted to know what you thought of Vic's (Hall) first drive where he
scored the touchdown in the spread offense.
COACH GROH: That was a pretty exciting play and showed the explosive nature of
the player himself and really -- that wasn't a spread play, that wasn't an
I-formation play, it wasn't a single wing play. That could have happened out of
any system. That was just a Vic Hall play all the way and quickly saw the
opportunity and had the speed to really make something out of it. So it ss
confirmation to us of some of the explosiveness that he brings to the position.
Clearly his circumstances were cut short a little bit the other night, so we
still have quite a bit to learn yet about Vic as a player in that position.
Q. Given the short field that the defense was faced with often on Saturday, were
you satisfied with their efforts Saturday?
COACH GROH: Satisfied is almost not existent I would say in most coaches'
mentality. Certainly satisfied is not a word I ever think or use. But, I thought
there were a lot of positives and clearly there were a lot of positives in what
the defense did. Certainly typified when they had to go on the field on the
seven yard line and three plays later, I think there had been three yards
gained, and really bowed up. I think that was a test of mental strength at that
time, too, as well as just execution because it wasn't the first time it had
happened in the game. It was being called out to really do the same thing they
had been called out to do a number of other times. We've spoken about any
unexpected change of possession, either side - whether you get the ball or you
have to go on defense - any unexpected change of possession from the norm that
is following a kick or a punt or a kickoff, any unexpected change is a challenge
to a team and a unit to prove what they really are. It is a challenge to you
offensively, that if you get the ball to, show what you can do with it. It is a
challenge with a team defensively, to show what they can do under those
circumstances. And the defensive players met those challenges pretty well the
other day. That should give them a pretty good sense of confidence. One of the
important things after every game is there's an overall reading that the team
takes on the result of the game but there's also an individual reading that
players take. For example a team can win, and a particular player not play very
well and he can feel very good about the fact that his team won, but not
necessarily very confident in his performance the next week. And it goes the
other way around, too. There's a great deal of disappointment when a player's
team doesn't win. By on the same token, if a player has played very well in the
game, and you're not just trying to throw him a fish or give him a silver ling.
He, in fact, has played very well. Then that player should have the confidence
that he'll have that he's on the right track to play very well again the next
week. There's a lot of players on that unit who played very well and their
individual confidence should be up.
Q. Could you talk about your kickoffs?
COACH GROH: Yeah, we had three of them. The first two were both satisfactory in
terms of distance and height. The third one was not really what we were looking
for, nor was the coverage. The first two, the height - in other words _ the hang
time and the location were good. Given the landmark of where we want to get the
10 cover people inside of was pretty good. I thought one of the significant
turning points in the game, really changed the momentum of the game, as we
scored the go ahead 14 7 and then got a penalty on the play. So then we had to
kickoff from the 15 yard line, kicked the ball with the shortest amount of hang
time that we had had, and we didn't have as much down-the-field infiltration as
on the previous two. The ball got returned to the 42 yard line and one play
later it was at the 36 yard line. They end up kicking a field goal, but we are
ahead 14 7, you would think it's 14 7, you're going to kick the ball off, the
other team is not going to have advantageous field position and now you're going
to have a chance to really grasp the momentum on a very foolish mental error
penalty in the end zone and then less than adequate coverage and the momentum
swung right back the other way.
So maybe understated in the overall circumstance, but in a lot of ways not
reported as such but it had the impact of what a turnover would be.
Q. Did Jameel (Sewell) get that penalty for making a signal with his hands?
COACH GROH: He did. Really in terms of what's offensive to me, the way the
William and Mary player after he was scored was penalized also. What's offensive
to me, what I think is over the edge, is a little different than the way the
rule is written but that's what the players have to understand. I didn't think
there was anything overtly wrong with either player, based on my sensitives to
it but clearly that's not the way it's called and the players are informed that
that's not the way that it's called. It's a very controversial issue last year
that some of you might remember with the BYU-Washington game where Washington
scored at the end -- very controversial, it got a lot of coverage - the
Washington player scored to put their team one behind on the last play of the
game and exuberantly jumped up and threw the ball up in the air and all he was
doing was normal human reaction. His team scored on the last play of the game.
Now that's pretty exciting, to score in the last play of the game.
I remember watching the play on TV or on replay. He made a pretty good play to
get there. It was pretty exciting, and anybody who has played any recreational
sports, whether you are playing softball and you hit a grand slam or you're a
golfer and you hit a really good shot. This kid jumped up threw the ball in the
air and ran over to celebrate with his teammates and the official flagged him.
BYU took the penalty, blocked the extra point and won the game. There was a lot
of controversy as to whether that should be called. I think every fan and every
could would say that's natural human reaction. There was no intent to call
attention to himself.
I thought in a lot of ways, it was natural human reaction the other day. But
maybe we've got droids that are writing the rules in terms of human reaction.
But that's what the rules are and that's what players have to understand. That's
why we have officials at almost every practice during training camp and we have
the officials talk to the players after practice relative to the position the
official has, whether he's the head linesman or an side judge, umpire or
referee. These are the calls I'm charged with making and this is why I make the
calls that I do. And in a lot of cases, those gentlemen are simply directed by
the supervisors of their conference, this is what you're going to call. That is
not always in sync with the way the coaches see the game. But we are not in
charge of the officials. I think that clearly in both cases, each player's
teammates quickly surrounded them so it became a team celebration, which is what
they tell you, that if you celebrate as a team, it's okay. But that's the world
that we live in and that's the world that we have to accept and accommodate
ourselves to.
Now if any of you would like to start a petition, okay, and send it around to
the gentleman who is in charge of all this nationally would be much appreciated.
And you won't get fined for it.
Q. I think this is the first time you are playing your second game and your
opponent is playing its first. How does that change the dynamic of the game?
COACH GROH: Yeah, I think you're right. I haven't thought that through. Well,
the big thing is that we recognize that they have had the opportunity to have as
many practices as they want to have on this game. We are limited by the amount
of practices we can have on the game because our focus really didn't turn toward
this game until last evening and then many players will be off today as is
normally the case as is part of our preparation for the game as well as their
recovery from the previous game, having worked last night. So there's the
possibility that the opponent could have anywheres as many as twice as many
practices for the game as we do. So we have to factor that into our thinking a
little bit. On one side of the ball, we tried to get a little head start last
night and on the other side of the ball we felt like we still had significant
internal issue to get fixed before we moved on.
Q. When you look at what TCU did last year against the run, what stands out,
because the numbers are pretty staggering?
COACH GROH: The numbers really point out why they are such a good team. First in
the country in rushing defense, first in the country in time of possession,
second in the country in overall defense, 12th in the country in overall
offense, I think 20th in the country in scoring, I think 8th in the country in
turnover margin. In other words, when they get it, they keep it and they end up
scoring with it. When the other team has got it, they take it away pretty
quickly and don't give up very many points. So to be No. 1 in the country in
time of possession, obviously is one of the reasons why a team is No. 1 in the
country in scoring defense. If the other team doesn't have it and you don't help
them score, our issue the other night wa we helped the other team score. So
offensively, we impacted both sides of the scoreboard. We impacted our side of
the scoreboard and we impacted their side of the scoreboard. That's not a good
deal, because it's the defense's job to keep the other team from scoring. When a
part of your team is helping them score then it makes it doubly difficult in
terms of keeping the points down and they (TCU) have done a good job in that.
They get it, they keep it, they don't turn it over, and that enables them to put
together long drives, keep the ball and then they have been real good at the
turnover deal, taking the ball away and then when they take it away and they/ve
got it, they don't give it back again for a long time. So that certainly puts
the priority and that's what's happened with a lot teams. A lot of teams just
don't have the ball long enough to score enough points.
Q. As a follow up to Jeff's question, are you able to prepare for them in the
summer knowing that it will be the same look?
COACH GROH: Yes. We saw our preparation for that game internally as far as our
scouting report worked and was similar with an opening game. We know nothing is
going to change. So when we came in yesterday or when we finished our review of
the previous game, we did not have to start doing our research or I get the
video or ask the video guy if the video is ready on this team yet. Clearly you
get to work on it right away since we knew it wasn't going to change and we were
able to put some plans in place some time ago. Now ther are always the things
that do change. Teams change from year to year. Clearly we had to deal with some
of those things during the game the other night but that's expected in the early
part of the seaon and it will still be the case in the third game. I'm sure by
that time the systems are still involved and they might have some early-season
opponents where they didn't have to do everything that they might have planned
to do in a particular game.
Q. With Steve Greer's 10 tackles as a freshman, were you impressed with his
performance?
COACH GROH: Very much so. Very impressed with him. There's a couple of
categories that are part of the makeup of a really good player and thus a really
good team. One of the things that has always been part of what we emphasized,
and sometimes we hit the target or sometimes certain players hit the target and
sometimes we don't hit the target, and that the saying - "good teams have lots
of players who don't make mistakes." Now, good teams have lots of players who
are doing other little things. Good teams have lots of players who are fast,
good teams have lots of players who are big, so on and so forth. Good teams have
lots of players who can make mistakes. There can be some RIVALS five star guys
who jump high and run and have a really good 40 yard dash time at the Army
combine so they get five stars. But when they come to college football, they
make a lot of mistakes and they are part of teams that struggle. The point I'm
getting to, Steven Greer is one of those players who has the capacity and it's
part of his make up and part of his talent, he takes instruction very well. He
applies it very quickly and he's a player that doesn't make very many mistakes.
He's where he's supposed to be when he's supposed to be there. And if he's not
there today, or this play, whatever direction he gets to make an improvement on,
he quickly processes it and uses it to do better. He really did a good job of
getting ready for the game.
He was well prepared for a number of plays that came up as part of the
preparation that were even one time occurrences in the game, he was right on
them. How do we know until he plays in the game? We didn't know he would be this
way either but that was certainly the indications he had been giving to us all
through last year and through training camp and that might be part of it now.
Clearly the competition is going to step up dramatically this week. For an
opener under any circumstances to play the way that he did and be relatively
error free, other than - we'll expose him from the category of anonymous from
the question last evening - but he was the player who just got to come off the
field on third down one time. So that was about his only significant mistake
that he made in the game.
Q. They threw a lot of short passes. Was that the way you chose to attack their
offense?
COACH GROH: That was the nature of the game we were going against. In grading
the tape, there were 24 passes that were thrown that were five yards less five
yards or less down the field. In other words, behind the line of scrimmage, or
no deeper than five yards down the field. A player can come virtually unblocked,
unless he's coming over the guard or center, a player can come virtually unblock
and not get to the quarterback under those circumstances. Plus I think there
were four or five plays on third down where William and Mary chose to run the
ball so as to not allow us to rush the passer. We stopped four out of those
five. So we got what we wanted out of the play, they chose not to run the ball
in order to protect the quarterback from any particular rush. They got out of it
what they wanted; the quarterback didn't get attacked. We got out of it what we
wanted; we got off the field.
Q. As a follow-up, you said in reference to the penalty afterwards, it was a
very foolish mistake but also you said there wasn't anything wrong with that
kind of celebration.
COACH GROH: I personally don't think either one I made a point to include both
players. I don't think it was over the top. For my personal sensitivities,
obviously that's not the sensitivities of the rule makers, so you have to know
what the rules are. The rules say, virtually, there is no room for celebration.
Even though they will tell you what the rule is for celebration. Now this is a
symbol that this player (Jameel Sewell), in his previous playing time, okay, a
few years ago, used upon scoring and was never penalized so apparently we had a
particularly sensitive official so this circumstance. But in any case, the point
has been made that to players, when you score, just walk away. You've got to
overcome human nature. But clearly the excitement and the exuberance of the
moment, blocked out those feelings.
Q. Do you want to back off on the foolish mental error comment?
COACH GROH: What are you trying to make an issue out of it? It was, it was
something that shouldn't have happened. Now the other player shouldn't have done
it either. It cost his team 15 yards, too. He was celebrating when he went into
the end zone.
But you can't do anything. Was it a foolish mental error on the part of the
Washington player? Apparently it was. You just have to know, because you don't
know the mind set of the guy who is calling it. They are all different. You get
a different guy every week, so all you can do is drop the ball and walk away in
order to be safe. That's all you can do. Otherwise you're putting yourself and
your team in jeopardy and that's a hard thing for an energetic young player who
has just done something positive. You all put yourself in his position; what
would you do? Be a grouch?
Q. Who got the penalty for just putting his finger straight up to the sky?
COACH GROH: Wali Lundy was always, praise God when he scored. Wali Lundy was in
a game against a MAC team, ran into the endzone and simply pointed at the sky
and the official flagged him for unsportsmanlike conduct. I said to the
official. It was a couple years ago. We can't even celebrate God anymore? That's
all he's doing.
Q. I wanted to ask you about the shotgun the fumbles came on balls that never
really got to him. Is that an issue at all?
COACH GROH: I think it's pretty apparent that they are. I think anybody else in
this room can answer that question, too. They had an impact on the game. They
cost us one lost series because it created a second and 20. Could the ball have
been caught? Yes. Should the ball have been in the bull's eye? Absolutely.
That's the center's job, put the ball in the bull's eye. It only going five
yards. You ought to be able to do it. The other ball never really got off the
ground. How can that happen? It was as befuddling to me as it is to you. I
cannot accept it, but I can at least see you snap is over the quarterbacks head
and the ball became airborne, it's hard to understand why the ball didn't become
airborne. It's not as if we are under center sometimes and under shotgun other
times. We have been in shotgun since March of the 27th. It ball never became
airborne.
Q. Did it hit his (Jack Shields) leg?
COACH GROH: It never became I mean, I didn't know what happened. I was like,
holy smoke, what happened here. And when I got a chance to study it. The ball
just, it was like it was stuck to the ground. Those are the things. Those are
the mistakes that change games. And that doesn't have anything to do with the
system that you're in. There's a lot of things that I have a reaction to that
happened, but I also have a sense of reality to them, too. Two out of the three
systems on our team are new and that's the first time the players have ever been
in a competitive situation with them. I told myself in the beginning that there
was a degree of patience that was going to have to be exercised and along with
that patience, there is going to have to be on my part positively reinforcement
to the players. If everything didn't look the way that I wanted it to look on
the first time we did it in practice, the first time that we did it in a game,
was to show composure and confidence and belief that it's going to be good,
because that's what the players are looking for in leadership. But there are
certain things that transcend any system that you're in; being able to snap the
ball properly, carrying the ball high and tight so you don't fumble it, catching
punts properly. Those things are - it doesn't make any difference what your
system is. You did that in the previous system and we ran hundreds of snaps in
the shotgun in previous years.
So this is something that we have been doing for quite a while. We have caught
hundreds of punts in practice, there's a right way and there's a dangerous way.
It wasn't whether the player caught the ball, it was how he caught it. He caught
it in a very dangerous way such that the odds are almost always that something
bad is going to happen. We fumble the ball when it isn't up high and tight and
that's something we always emphasize. There's three plays that were worth a lot
of points in the game that didn't have anything to do with the system. Those are
the kind of mistakes that, as I said last night, it takes a lot of good plays
and it doesn't many bad plays to lose a game. Those are some of the bad plays
that lost the game. And then we had the opportunity to make two really good
plays on two interceptions and we didn't make them. And we had a chance for a
non offensive touchdown there, which is what the scoreboard is all about and we
didn't do it in that particular case.
Q. Jared Green said during training camp that you were demanding guys be
playmakers this year. Do you think you gave your players enough chances to make
plays?
COACH GROH: We had two chances on those two interceptions.
Q. I mean offensive playmakers.
COACH GROH: Well, the receivers, there were approximately 40 passes called and
when the pass is called it is up to the receivers to get open. The quarterbacks
had plenty of chances to run and pass with it, so I certainly don't think they
were inhibited from their opportunity to make plays. Did they execute their
opportunities well enough? Clearly had we done so, we would have scored more
points.
Q. Did you intend to rely on Vic and Jameel to run so much or was that part of
your plan?
COACH GROH: They are two of the better runners on the team. Clearly they had two
excellent runs for touchdowns, so in terms of allowing the playmakers to make
plays, to inhibit them from doing such would be taking the ball out of their
hands in a way the defense would have difficulty doing so.. Some of those runs
came on scrambles that you add to the total, but I would say it's unlikely that
we will see a number that high in the future.
Q. I've heard coaches who have been involved with the spread offense say that it
takes up to a year for the team to get up to speed on it. How far along do you
think they are and are you pleased with where they are?
COACH GROH: All I know about how far along we are with it is, clearly we are as
far along as we were on Saturday night as we needed to be. How far away that is
from the finish line, we'll just have to wait and see as things play out. Many
of the teams that are majoring in this system right now, not being able to say
exactly what the reason; but I know a lot of the teams majoring in this system
are Big 12 team. While this style of offense now has prolificated throughout
high school football, lots of teams are running it. Texas is an area where it is
very abundant. In fact the coach now at North Texas achieved tremendous success
at it in high school and went directly to the job at North Texas.
Many of the quarterbacks who are playing in the Big 12 in these systems have
been in this system nowliterally or eight or nine years because it's what they
played in high school and they came and red shirted for a year and now you are
seeing the quarterbacks in Missouri and Kansas, for example, the previous three
or four years, both those teams had great success after switching to this
offense. Those quarterbacks chose their schools and were recruited by their
schools principally because they already knew the offense almost before the
coaches did. Yeah, I think probably the learning curve is a little bit more
significant or a little bit more extreme for those players than if they were
players who have had a long term background in it.
Q. On Saturday it seemed like you were hesitant to change the gameplan and throw
deep passes and use the superior size on the offensive line. Is that the case?
COACH GROH: No, actually I think there was a series there where we went I know a
change occurred because we talked about it on the sideline and tried to use
these particular pass plays. We put another player in at quarterback to try to
accommodate that fact. We can't use pass plays and then use the lineman to push
the ball up the middle at that time. We have to be either running it or throwing
it. At that time we decided what we wanted to do, we were not getting the push
and the movement that we wanted out of the running game. We wanted to try to
major in the passing game and unfortunately we had another one of those non
system related glitches; on a play in which we had a guy pretty wide open for
what would have been a significant gain and the quarterback had difficulty
executing the throwing motion and lost the ball. Not only did we lose probably
what was going to be significant gain but we lost field position from which they
ultimately scored.
So another one of those mistakes, I can understand some of the reads that came a
little bit slower as a result of this is the first game in competition with the
system, but shotgun snaps and throwing motions, those are things the players
have to execute when those things come up.
Q. Utah ran the table last year, BYU just beat Oklahoma, TCU is nationally
ranked. What are your overall impressions of the Mountain West?
COACH GROH: It's a very strong conference. BYU has had great success for a long
time. TCU over the last last five or six years, TCU is one of the four or five
winningest programs in the country. They finished seventh in the country last
year. They have won 10 games or more, something like six out of the last eight
years. A very, very strong team. A lot of continuity in what they are doing with
their systems. Again, a lot of carryover. You can see that the quarterback they
have was the 5A Player of the Year. He played in a similar system to what they
are running. This is his third year as a starter with another year to go. So
he's been doing what he's been doing for a long time. He's a very good player. I
hope we can make it such that you don't see that for yourself. But watching him
on video, just evaluating football players, we are very respectful of him. He's
a really good player. He runs. He throws. You can tell he's a player that has a
great belief in himself. They have as fast a wide receiver as we will probably
see this year. They have two 350 pound tackles, so live will change a little bit
for Matt Conrath and Nate Collins come this Saturday. Things will look a little
bit different up there. They have a fellow who led the country in sacks last
year.
We saw some speed off the edges the other night and we'll see more speed.
Talking to people who are in the Mountain West Conference, they have said to us,
here is the exact quote we got from them, "They are the fastest team that we
play and they are getting faster." So the person who told us that sees them
every year, and sees them as getting faster than they have been. Again, one of
the things people from around the country go to Texas for is speed, and there I
think their roster has something like 96 percent of their players are from
Texas. So they are finding a good amount of speed there.
Q. Last week you made the analogy with Jack Nicklaus. In regards to your
offense, what is the main thing on offense that you will be point toward?
COACH GROH: Good teams have lots of players who don't make mistakes. That's the
one thing that has to be corrected on that side. There's a lot less mistakes
made, many of which I think we've enumerated here this morning.
Q. With Will Barker, does the challenge fall on him on following Hughes?
COACH GROH: At least last year, he was always a left side rusher for their
defense, so it will be Will. Eugene (Monroe) last year, a little bit the same
thing. We went down last year and played Georgia Tech and they had the two
touted outside pass rushers. Certainly the way Eugene performed in that game
enabled him to solidify his draft status; that is, the scouts could look at him
and say, okay, he's blocked a certain amount of players but they are never going
be to NFL pass rushers, here is a guy who is touted as an NFL pass rusher and he
really dealt with him. Well, Will had the same kind of player on the other side.
I believe it was in that game he was the ACC Player of the Week. That won't do
him any good this week. That won't help him block this guy because both of them
will be on team's lists. This will be one of those games, that for each player,
will give him an opportunity to I'm sure this game by personnel people, those
two players ,will get a real good luck.
Q. Of all the turnovers, Mark's was the one that was the most of a fluke. Other
than that, were you pleased with his play?
COACH GROH: Yeah, I thought he did decently. There's nothing to just take your
breath away there. I would say that pretty much for that unit. There was no
stand out in a particular area. So across the board, we have to give it our
concentration to overall improvement.
Q. Having three quarterbacks sharing the playing time at what point do you just
pick one?
COACH GROH: Do you want a calendar date on that? Clearly when one of them shows
that he is by far the best option, with the two quarterbacks, who as I mentioned
earlier, Vic and Jameel, have amongst their skills the ability to run with the
ball. For those teams that have that kind of player, TCU has one of those
players. Their quarterback was, I think, the third leading rusher on the team
last year. And so when a team you will see a number of similarities in the two
teams' offensive styles. TCU is primarily, more than any other personnel group,
they have four wide receivers in the game. They will be in the shotgun almost
all the time and sometimes those four wide receivers will turn into five
receivers when they go empty. Teams that have the quarterback who has the
capacity to run the ball as their quarterback clearly does and as two of our
quarterbacks do, the defense does not spread out to match the five wide
receivers, then there's an open player. So the defense, whoever you are,
whatever your defensive system is, that spreads the defenses out. And when the
quarterback is capable of being a runner as well as a passer, he nearly becomes
like the 12th man on offense. So the team has five wide receivers out, and six
offensive linemen, and then still have a runner in the backfield, that adds up
to 12. And so they do very well with that. That's one of the significant issues
that they are going to have to deal with on defense. Fortunately we had 35 or
some odd practices of dealing with that with our team. When you have that type
of quarterback, it's a comforting thing to know that you have two of them and
that you're able to utilize one more than you otherwise would if it weren't for
somebody else who could come in and do the same thing. With these two players
here, in order to be able to exploit the skills of one, it's really necessary to
get the other one equally ready. Otherwise, if one of them is banged up or
unable to go, then the whole system changes. But with two of them we have a
great facility to do that. In the case of those two players, I think that will
certainly be the case for some time.
Q. Because of the increased amount of turnovers, do you feel that limits you on
the defensive end?
COACH GROH: No, I think it certainly could become more relative if it happened
later in the game, like the second quarter plays, so I wouldn't see it as much
of a factor. It's just a question of catch the ball, not catch the ball.
Unfortunately, Chase (Minnifield) doesn't fall into this category. Chase was a
very good multiple player. In high school, he played running back, kick
returner, defensive back, kicker and punter. So he's a real football player and
he's a really good athlete and he can really catch the ball.
Denzel, I wouldn't say has quite the same ball skills as Chase. So it's a little
trickier there. Chase is a very capable catcher. In fact, on last Thursday, he
had a very good interception. He was jumping for the ball, body was well the
ball was clearly in his hands. Body was a little bit torqued, no reason not to
catch the ball. But it's just one of those unfortunate things. I think
sometimes, actually we had an occasion in training camp, with both Chris Cook
and Ras-I Dowing found themselves in a similar position and they were running to
catch that very same ball and were so aggressive in going for the ball they
almost caused themselves no knock the ball down. It really does occur that so
many of the interception chances or ball drills, the defensive backs, the
circumstances that come up in practice are on deeper balls and we did set up
drills in training camp for the corners for this; that is my point being, that a
lot of catches that they make on interceptions in those were defensive backs
running away from the line of scrimmage and they are catching the ball this way,
almost the same fashion as a wide receiver. They have less opportunities in
practice to catch the ball coming downhill. Linebackers catch the ball coming
downhill. Seldom catch it going backwards. It's the other way around for
defensive backs and I can only conjecture that maybe that had something to do
with it. We'll be back to that same sideline drill here again this week.
Q. I've heard you talk about the shotgun in short yardage situations before.
What about the quarterback sneak?
COACH GROH: Overall on quarterback sneaks, kind of my feeling overall, now we
have used them on occasion. I've always felt that runners run, passers pass,
catchers catch, this is it one of the most critical plays in the game when you
do it, and all of the teams I've ever been associated with, it's the least
practiced play. It is hard to simulate in practice unless you are going to do it
in the scrimmage, the actual dynamics of the plays, much less so than other
plays. So, when the game is on the line and you have a critical fourth down
play, I've always been reluctant to run a play that gets less practice turns or
less full speed practice turns than all of our other plays. Perhaps I'm
influenced by the fact that I can remember two times in games that I was
involved with as a defensive coach and our team had the ball and called time out
before a critical short yardage play. After all of that time to think about it,
decided to run the quarterback sneak, and in each particular case, the
quarterback sneak was snuffed out and in each particular case, we had a running
back on our team who will eventually be voted into the Hall of Fame. Those
particular kinds of experiences color our thinking.
Q. One of the keys to making your offense go is your wide receivers. Were you
pleased with their work and what needs to happen to make them really go?
COACH GROH: There's a lot of refinement necessary there yet, in terms of the
precision of the route running. We're looking for a lot more precision in that,
and probably a lot more definitey, and what I mean by that is just the player
being very confident at very high rated speed which opens up holes in the
defense faster. That's on the list of back to the question about priority
targets for improvement, that's amongst the areas that are relatively young crew
over there. (Javaris) Brown's first game, (Matt) Snyder's first game, (Quintin)
Hunter and (Tim_Smith, their first look at it; we are hoping they are able to
challenge for playing time soon. The availability of these young players who
have not been in this type of play previously in the program, not very many of
them, would enable us to do some things that, frankly in the past, would have
been ill advised. But now that being the case, I'm very anxious for those
things.
They are one of the things that I have to make sure that I'm not being overly
patient but in the same times being realistic in pushing for more and faster.
Q. You spoke in particular about two nine-win teams that rebounded from a
season-opening loss. Is there a common thread with those teams?
COACH GROH: That is among the things that we addressed yesterday for
clarification's sake. I told the players we had two teams in 2002 and 2007 that
lost the first game. In fact the 2002 team lost the first two games and both
went on to win seven games in a row and cumulatively won nine games. That
history doesn't mean that that's a resource to do it again other than to point
out that this has been done; it can be done. What they did have in common, they
stay unified; they stayed consistent in their approach. They kept working and
they kept believing in what they were doing and in the system and they used
practice every day to get better and to keep marching forward. Probably I don't
think as I don't really remember, but I think it's probably unlikely that from
outside the walls of the building that those two teams were getting a great deal
of positive reinforcement either. But they got it to where it was necessary and
that was through the relationships that they had with each other and the
confidence that they had in the system.
DraftScripts by ASAP Sports
Virginia notes: Groh says errors tied to fundamentals
Published: September 8, 2009
Mistakes not systemic; they're fundamental
Virginia coach Al Groh knew that there would be adjustments with a new offense
and special teams.
But while he admits that he's being patient with the development of the units,
he's not pinning the blame for Saturday's seven-turnover performance on
inexperience.
"There are certain things that transcend any system that you're in," he said.
"Being able to snap the ball properly, carrying the ball high and tight so you
don't fumble it, and catching punts properly. With those things, it doesn't make
any difference what your system is."
The debut of a new spread offense wasn't as revolutionary as it was hyped up to
be. Quarterbacks Jameel Sewell and Vic Hall continued to run the ball, and Marc
Verica threw a number of the same passes as last year.
Verica, who finished 7 for 11 with a fumble and no interceptions, said that the
term "spread" can mean a number of different things.
"People get too caught up in the terminology," he said. "This isn't the exact
same thing as last year, but football is football. You've got to block, tackle
and run good routes."
He added he expected the team to continue mixing in the no-huddle attack in the
future.
Ignoring the critics
It's not the first time, but again Groh finds himself on the hot seat early in
the season. He said that he preaches tuning out distractions to his team from
the start of training camp.
"You have to be prepared to handle both the love and the hate, because both of
them come over the course of the season," he said. "You don't start saying that
after the game, you start saying that all year long."
The road doesn't get easier for Virginia as it plays host to No. 17 TCU on
Saturday at Scott Stadium.
"We have to stick together to overcome this," Hall said. "The only thing that
can right something like this is hard work."
Flags against joy?
Twice during Saturday's game, an illegal-celebration flag was thrown -- once for
each team. Both times the player performed a short non-offensive hand gesture in
celebration.
Groh made it clear he didn't approve of the NCAA crackdown on such penalties,
saying that players had to fight their instincts to celebrate after a big play.
"The point has been made that, when you score, just walk away -- you've got to
overcome human nature," he said. "I thought in a lot of ways, it was natural
human reaction the other day. But maybe we've got some droids that are writing
the rules in terms of human reaction."
He also cited the controversial play in a BYU-Washington game last year when
Washington lost the game by one point after a similar penalty.
QBs accept system
Now that it's been revealed that all three quarterbacks will get playing time
each week, Verica was asked when they found out. He said they started to realize
what would happen in the middle of training camp.
"We all bought into it, because we were all going to play," he said. "It doesn't
really matter who starts."
Groh had positive and negative things to say about each yesterday, adding that
if he puts in a quarterback with running ability, it's "like having a 12th man."
-- Michael Phillips
U.Va. morning update
Michael Phillips
Sep 07, 2009
Before we get to the update check out Paul Woody’s column, saying that Groh
needs a little more time to be fully judged this season.
Here’s what the coach had to say:
—He refused to blame the new system for the turnovers, saying that it was
fundamentals like snapping, carrying the ball well, and catching punts that cost
the team.
—On TCU: “A coach in their conference said that they’re the fastest team we play
and they’re getting faster.“
—He feels that “lots of refinement” is needed in the wide receivers ability to
get open.
—Advice to players on dealing with criticism: “You’ve got to be able to tune out
the hate AND the love, since you’ll get both over the course of the season. If
you start 12-0, you’ve got to be able to tune it out, and if you’re 0-12 you’ve
got to be able to tune it out.“
And finally, Groh isn’t a fan of the excessive celebration penalties that were
given out (one to each team, both times for a non-offensive hand gesture of
celebration.) He feels that a player has to fight his human instinct to
celebrate if he wants to avoid a penalty. “You’ve just got to walk away -
overcome human nature,“ he said. And he added that if any of us reporters wanted
to start a petition to end the crackdown, he’d appreciate it because we hacks
can’t get fined.
Players headed in soon. Lots more as this Labor Day rolls on.
Think less, play more is needed
By Aaron McFarling
CHARLOTTESVILLE -- On Saturday, Virginia fans went on a blind date fearing the
worst but hoping for the best. They wound up dining by candlelight with a
four-headed octopus.
Nobody could have anticipated that William and Mary -- a team picked to finish
fifth out of six teams in its division in the Colonial Athletic Association
preseason poll of coaches and media -- would walk out of Scott Stadium a 26-14
winner, but that's what happened. Reporters and fans scurried to their computers
to bury coach Al Groh, as they should have. The loss was brutal. Unacceptable.
Embarrassing.
But to make any season predictions based on that game is dangerous.
Saturday's debacle marked UVa's fourth straight season-opening loss. And they
haven't just been losses; they've been sloppy, nauseating losses.
The Cavs folded at Pittsburgh 38-13 in 2006. They fell at Wyoming 23-3 in 2007.
They were destroyed at home against Southern California 52-7 last year.
But in each of those three seasons, they rebounded to win their second game.
None of those bounce-back opponents was the caliber of TCU, which will visit
Charlottesville this Saturday, but the fact is that UVa historically has
improved after Week 1.
Why? How could the Cavaliers practice for a month and look so inept? They had
seven turnovers against the Tribe, their most since 1994. They couldn't cradle
potential interceptions on defense. They couldn't get their receivers open. They
couldn't catch punts.
Two errant shotgun snaps were borderline comical -- including one that rolled to
the quarterback.
"How that can happen is as befuddling to me as it is to you," Groh said Tuesday.
The easy thing to do is point at the spread offense and the special teams. After
all, both systems are new, installed by freshly hired assistant coaches. Perhaps
they just need time.
But fumbling the ball when you're cocking it to pass? Failing to pick up inches
on fourth down?
"That's not the offensive scheme," quarterback Marc Verica said. "That's just
fundamental football, really."
The same culprit that struck in the previous three season openers.
Groh preaches fundamentals as much as every other coach, but he certainly
doesn't do it the same way. And maybe that's UVa's problem in season-openers:
The players are coming off too much exposure to Groh. There's too much thinking,
not enough free-spirited play.
A few weeks ago, Virginia's official Web site ran an article and video feature
depicting a day in the life of Groh. It was interesting stuff, trailing Groh
from the time he left for work in the predawn hours until his return home around
11 p.m.
Two things struck me while I watched this video:
1. Groh's players aren't kidding when they say their coach is an extremely
dedicated worker, and 2. Groh speaks to his players the exact same way he talks
to the rest of the world, complete with lots of NFL analogies, esoteric
philosophical asides and copious use of the word "circumstance."
I'm not sure why that second one surprised me, but it did. For some reason, I
thought Groh would be different around his players. Less wooden. More rah-rah.
More plain-spoken in an attempt to connect with the 18- to 22-year-olds he's
coaching.
Instead, he seems to make things more complicated than they need to be. And when
you're overthinking, you're underhitting, undercatching and underperforming --
all hallmarks of disastrous football games.
Is it any wonder the Cavaliers seem to play better the less their lives revolve
around Groh? Perhaps things just get simpler. Once school starts, all the
drilling and film study are directed toward a specific opponent, classes (we
hope) provide a distraction and Saturdays become an opportunity for release. The
game is reduced to a game again. Athletic ability shines through.
It remains to be seen how much talent this Cavaliers team really has, and how
well that talent is suited to Gregg Brandon's spread offense, but no system can
absorb seven turnovers. The Cavaliers went 0-5 last season when they lost the
turnover battle, 5-2 when they won or tied it.
So we can safely assume the Cavs are not quite as bad as they showed against
William and Mary. And maybe, as the team starts thinking less and playing more
relaxed, we'll find that the four-headed octopus at least has a decent
personality.
Virginia football notebook: Miscues include ill-timed penalties
Doug Doughty
CHARLOTTESVILLE -- Virginia's shortcomings Saturday in a 26-14
loss to William and Mary were not limited to the Cavaliers' seven turnovers.
UVa was penalized eight times for 75 yards, including an unsportsmanlike-conduct
call made against quarterback Jameel Sewell after the Cavaliers' second
touchdown.
Sewell, who scored on an 8-yard run, touched his two thumbs and two forefingers
together in the diamond-cutter signal popularized by professional wrestler
Diamond Dallas Page and, later, rapper Jay-Z.
"A very foolish mental error," was the way UVa coach Al Groh described it
Monday.
The Cavaliers, who were ahead 14-7 at the time, were forced to kick off from
their 15-yard line instead of the 30. William and Mary took over at its 43
following a 25-yard Jonathan Grimes return.
The possession ended in a missed Brian Pate field goal, but UVa had inferior
field possession for the rest of the half.
"It's 14-7, you're going to kick the ball off and the other team's not going to
have advantageous field position," Groh said. "You're going to have a chance to
grab some momentum. All of a sudden, the momentum swung back the other way."
Groh noted that William and Mary's B.R. Webb was penalizd for excessive
celebration after his 50-yard interception return for a touchdown sealed the win
for the Tribe with 2:39 left.
"Really, what's offensive to me and what I think is over the edge is a little
different from the way the rule is written," Groh said. "but that's what the
players have to understand.
"I don't think there was anything overtly wrong with either player, based on my
sensitivities. But, clearly, that's not the way it's called. And the players are
informed that that's not the way it's being called."
Virginia Tech quarterback Tyrod Taylor was penalized last year after doing the
diamond-cutter, which Jay-Z uses to promote his record label and clothing line.
"There was a very controversial issue [involving a celebration] last year in the
BYU-Washington game," said Groh, referring to a late touchdown by Huskies'
quarterback Jake Loker. "This kid jumped up, threw the ball in the air and went
to celebrate with his teammates."
An official's flag flew and Washington was penalized 15 yards before its
extra-point attempt, which BYU blocked for a 30-29 victory.
"I think every fan and every coach would say it was natural human reaction,"
Groh said. "It was no intent to draw attention to himself. Maybe we've got some
'droids' who are writing the rules in terms of human reaction.
"That's the world we live and the world we've got to accept. ... When you score,
just walk away."
On second thought
Groh took questions Saturday night and again Sunday on a teleconference that had
the same tone, "Did you see it coming?"
He did not respond affirmatively at the time but provided a little more insight
Monday.
Groh said it was befuddling to watch a shotgun snap that never became airborne
and led to a UVa fumble, "but I also have a sense of reality," he added.
"Two out of the three systems on our team are new, and I told myself at the
beginning that there was a degree of patience that would have to be exercised.
"If everything didn't work the first time we did it in practice or a game, I
would have to show composure and confidence and belief that it was going to be
good."
Grasping
Verica, the third of three Virginia quarterbacks to play Saturday, said he never
had experienced the sensation of having the ball slip out of his hands, as it
did on a late fumble.
Like Groh, Verica said that his arm had not started forward and that UVa would
not have been successful in a review.
"They blitzed someone and I had to get rid of it pretty quick," Verica said.
"[Kris] Burd was hot and he was open. I just kind of took the ball without the
laces and my hands were sweaty. It was just one of those things."
Odds 'n' ends
Groh said that fifth-year outside linebacker Denzel Burrell had the best game of
his college career and that he was pleased with sophomore Cameron Johnson on the
other side.
UVa defense offers some hope
By Jay Jenkins
Published: September 8, 2009
Fans throughout Scott Stadium cringed in disgust as the football clanged off the
hands of cornerback Chase Minnifield and bounced around the field.
With perfect execution, the play would have resulted in seven points for
Virginia at a time when the offense was in dire need of help.
The same, of course, could have been said for an errant pass thrown towards the
direction of linebacker Denzel Burrell.
It was a pair of plays that could have changed the outcome of a
hapless affair with in-state foe William & Mary. It also summed up a night of
missed opportunities in a 26-14 loss.
“Clearly those are lost opportunities,” Virginia coach Al Groh said. “Those are
lost opportunities to have an impact on how the game is going to turn out.
“Just as if we throw a pass into the end zone and a player drops it — that
stands out to everybody. We had those opportunities to change the game with
takeaways.”
It would have been easy for Groh, now “officially” the defensive coordinator, to
applaud the effort of his
defense after the Cavaliers’ offense lost the ball seven times. And the defense
was, in fact, on the field for a majority of the game and held the Tribe to a
touchdown and seven field goal attempts, of which they converted four.
“Now you can say the defense did a good job of coming in in difficult
circumstances to keep it from being a touchdown and hold it to a field goal,”
Groh said, “but in reality we had our opportunity to turn it into a zero
[points] and on the other end we had an opportunity to turn it into seven.”
In all, Virginia allowed William & Mary to gain 309 yards of total offense and
15 first downs, three of which came off a penalty. Senior cornerback Chris Cook,
playing his first game in a year, also came up with an interception.
Was the defensive-minded Groh “satisfied” with the end result?
“Satisfied is almost not existent, I would say, in most coaches’ mentality.
Certainly satisfied is not a word I ever think or use,” Groh said. “But, I
thought there were a lot of positives and clearly there were a lot of positives
in what the defense did.”
Entering games that were played Monday, Virginia ranked No. 94 in total offense
and No. 55 in total defense. The team’s top ranking nationally? The Cavaliers
rank No. 31 in pass efficiency defense and sacks allowed.
Snapping snafu
With the move to the spread offense followed adjustments for Virginia center
Jack Shields.
The Cavaliers (0-1) were in the shotgun formation on every snap of the contest,
even a 4th-and-1 that was eventually a quarterback keeper.
It was far from a walk in the park — Shields fired a rocket that quarterback
Jameel Sewell lost the handle on and snapped another that seemed to clank off
his leg and resulted in a fumble.
“I think it’s pretty apparent that they are [an issue],” Groh said. “They had an
impact on the game. They cost us one lost series because it created a
2nd-and-20. Could the ball have been caught? Yes.
“Should the ball have been in the bull’s eye? Absolutely. That’s the center’s
job, put the ball in the bull’s eye. It’s only going five yards. You ought to be
able to do it.”
Extra points …
Groh said that he did not anticipate significant changes on Virginia’s depth
chart for the upcoming game. … Texas Christian, the Cavaliers’ opponent
Saturday, has never played a game in the state of Virginia. … UVa is 12-17
against ranked teams under Groh. TCU is ranked No. 17 and likely to climb
following the results of the opening weekend. … Virginia linebacker Steve Greer
became the first freshman to register 10 tackles in a season opener since
Antonio Appleby did the feat in 2005. … Fourteen rookies made their debuts
against William & Mary. … It has been 26 years since the Cavaliers had
back-to-back losing seasons. It is the 16th longest in the country.
Cavs need to correct mistakes
By Jerry Ratcliffe
Published: September 8, 2009
One of the many facets of a head football coach’s responsibility is to keep
everyone in the program positive and build confidence.
In past years, Virginia’s Al Groh has done a masterful job in those particular
aspects, bringing back teams that suffered near-disastrous season openers only
to shine at season’s end.
Groh may need to put together the best coaching job of his career to get this
edition of the Cavaliers back on track, while staring down the barrel at one of
the toughest schedules in the country.
Should he turn Virginia around, his supporters won’t be surprised.
If he doesn’t and the team gets off to a poor 0-3 start, there are already
rumors that UVa could pull a Clemson and replace Groh with one of his assistants
during the bye week.
Turning it around
The Cavaliers put forth a disappointing effort in a 26-14 home loss to FCS
member William & Mary on Saturday night. Plagued by seven costly turnovers,
Virginia’s receivers struggled to get open and its offensive line turned in a
putrid performance, especially considering four of the five starters returned
from last year’s squad.
So, Groh and his staff’s focus this week will be to try to correct the mistakes
made against W&M, while bracing for the nation’s No. 17 team coming to town,
Texas Christian University. Trust us when we note that the visiting Horned Frogs
will show no mercy on the Cavs if they repeat the same mistakes of a few days
past.
Surely the UVa coaching staff has submerged into the McCue Center and practice
fields, trying to find a way to get this thing turned around. All the while,
they’ll have to do it with negativity swirling all about.
Dealing with the bad
Having experience in this sort of thing, Groh always conditions his players
during the off-season to deal with the criticism, the negativity. Still, there’s
no real simulation for getting booed, jeered, or thrashed on talk radio and
elsewhere.
“One of the things that we tell [players] before the season ever starts is a
team collectively and the players individually have to be prepared to handle
both the love and the hate, because both of them come during the course of the
season,” Groh said during his weekly press conference on Monday.
“Every week the team is going to get one or the other,” the embattled coach
said. “If you’re 12-0, the team has to be able to tune out the love. And if
you’re 0-12, a team has to be able to tune out the hate. Either way affects how
the players think and all the players can think about is what they need to do to
do their jobs.”
Groh would have been remiss if he had not brought up past reversals when he
addressed the Cavaliers on Sunday. The team had to have been bummed out when it
returned to the McCue Center for meetings a day after losing and not looking so
good in the process.
In 2002 and 2007, Groh managed to lead UVa back from awful starts, and nearly
did it again last year before turnovers sabotaged potential home wins against
Miami and Clemson.
The 2002 turnaround was quite dramatic as it dropped a home opener to Colorado
State, then was hammered at Florida State only to come back and reel off six
consecutive wins. That Matt Schaub-led squad won nine games, including an upset
over 15th-ranked West Virginia in the Continental Tire Bowl.
It all started with a home upset over Lou Holtz’s No. 22 ranked South Carolina
team.
Marc Verica, one of three Cavalier quarterbacks to see action in Saturday’s loss
to the Tribe, remembers the other big season comeback in 2007.
“There’s a lot of guys on this team that have seen the highs and seen the lowest
of lows,” Verica said. “That experience is something you can rely on in a
situation like this.
“This isn’t the first time we’ve been in this circumstance where the first game
didn’t go as we had hoped,” Verica pointed out. “We really only had each other.
Everyone else was against us. This situation is no different. I would just tell
people not to forget that. One of our best seasons here was after a pretty
devastating loss in Laramie when we lost 23-3 and put together a pretty
unbelievable season.”
Verica said the older players on the team will use that as a source of
motivation, which seems to be the logical thing to do.
He was referring to a classic “trap” game at Wyoming in 2007.
It may have been the worst performance this columnist has ever seen by a UVa
team. However, the Cavaliers came back and won seven straight games, won nine
for the season and nearly won the 10th, losing to high-scoring Texas Tech in the
Gator Bowl.
Even the younger players on the squad can relate back to last season when most
everyone gave up on Virginia after it lost three of the first four games,
including a
lopsided second-half setback at Duke. The Cavs seemed dead in the water, but
came back and stunned Maryland, 31-0 the following week, the start of four wins
in a row, including upsets over nationally ranked North Carolina and Georgia
Tech.
“Definitely similarities between those games (Duke and W&M),” Verica said.
“Hopefully we can bounce back the way we did last year because that was a pretty
defining moment in our season last year, how we came back and fought through
that adversity.”
However, it’s easier said than done.
As quarterback Vic Hall said after the loss Saturday, all of Virginia’s mistakes
in that game are correctable. Coaches have to keep the confidence up, but the
players have to fight their way out of the quagmire of negativity.
“Any time you lose a game as bad as we lost to Wyoming or the other night,
you’ve just got to stick together and trust each other, trust your teammates,
trust your coaches, and trust yourself,” Verica said.
“Things aren’t always going to go as planned, so it’s important to have faith in
the system and faith in yourself to win the confidence back.”
It’s going to take more than faith to beat TCU. Virginia must execute at a high
level and eliminate the plethora of mistakes it committed against William &
Mary.
Verica said the beauty of football is that there’s always a chance for
redemption.
Well, if this team doesn’t redeem itself quickly, it may just cost its head
coach his job.