
Gillen's crew overcoming tough slate
By Jerry Ratcliffe / Daily Progress sports editor
December 11, 2004
If you had told Pete Gillen a month ago that his basketball team would enter
Virginia’s exam break with a 7-1 record, he probably would have kissed you.
“I would have been very surprised,” Gillen said the other night of his team’s
record.
His Cavaliers had just survived a 79-67 test from upset-minded Furman, a team
loaded with 3-point shooters, and a team that should do well in the Southern
Conference this season.
Murderer’s row
Whoever assembled UVa’s early season schedule didn’t do the Cavaliers any
favors. The conspiracy theorists will tell you it was intentional, so that those
bent on getting rid of Gillen will have a better case to present at the end of
this season than they did at the end of the last one.
If that is the case, then the stratagem blew up in someone’s face like one of
those exploding cigars.
Whoever scheduled this November/December lineup is either stupid, doesn’t know
anything about basketball or sports in general, or had a hidden agenda. Let’s
hope it’s not the latter. At least stupidity is a valid excuse.
Throw another log on the fire and let’s examine the gauntlet that Gillen’s
Cavaliers have had to run through over a 20-day period.
Let’s see, that’s eight games in 20 days, almost one every two days. Five of
those came in an 11-day stretch, four in eight days, with all four of those
coming in different cities. One of those was in Chicago, one in Richmond, and
yet another in Ames, Iowa.
In basketball’s version of the reality show Survivor, Pete’s team did about as
good as any team in the nation could have under those conditions.
The first real test was Arizona, ranked 10th in the nation at the time. Coach
Lute Olson’s Wildcats have been one of the winningest programs in the nation
over the last 10 years and one of the highest scoring. Somehow, the Cavaliers
manhandled the ‘Cats in a stunning upset that raised eyebrows all across the
hoops world.
A week later, Richmond came to town. The Spiders always put a quality team on
the floor and it has traditionally been a real donnybrook when UR faces the Cavs.
As Gillen has pointed out several times over the years, playing an ACC team is
like the Super Bowl to Richmond. But again, the Cavs breezed through the Spiders
with unexpected ease.
Rough road
Then came the brutal part of the schedule: at Northwestern in the ACC/Big Ten
Challenge; then Auburn on a neutral floor in Richmond; then a trip to Iowa
State, an upset waiting to
happen.
Gillen described the 48-44 win over Northwestern as “water torture.” The Big Ten
team, playing at its bandbox of a home court, had another advantage. The
Wildcats play Princeton-style basketball, a slow-motion offense based on
spreading the floor and outsmarting defenses. It’s premise
is to get easy, back-door layups.
Well, that’s the way they did it at Princeton. Northwestern has tinkered with
the philosophy so that it also features strong 3-point shooting.
The Cavs fell behind, but played strong defense and denied Northwestern’s
strategy to flow, and pulled out the win. A lot of teams would have lost this
game, particularly a couple of Gillen’s previous teams, which were known for
folding under pressure on the road.
From a snail’s pace to a greyhound’s pace, the Cavaliers had to put it in
fast-forward to keep up with Auburn’s run-and-gun style. The Tigers, coached by
former North Carolina player Jeff Lebo, brought a unique attack to VCU’s Siegel
Center.
Auburn didn’t have size. What the Tigers did have was five guys who could all
handle the ball, could all shoot the 3 and all could run.
While Virginia prefers that helter-skelter tempo, it wasn’t easy to put the
Northwestern thing behind them and play at break neck speed with the Tigers in a
matter of two days.
Virginia jumped ahead, fell behind and then played leapfrog with the score until
taking control at the very end, winning 89-87.
Then came the trip to Iowa.
To Chicago, back to Charlottesville, on to Richmond, back to Charlottesville,
out to Iowa, all in six days. The two sportswriters who made these trips, beat
writer Andrew Joyner and your’s truly, were exhausted from all the travel. So,
the team had to be tired.
Iowa State was nothing but a trap. The Big 12 team has hungy to get an ACC team
in its place, which I might add is a tough place to play. Only a few times in my
career have I had to cover my ears because of the crowd noise. Up until the trip
to Ames, all those venues had been in ACC arenas.
The Cyclones knew that beating Virginia would do the same thing for them that
Virginia got out of beating Arizona.
Still, the Cavs almost pulled it out and didn’t even play their best game.
“We almost stole that one,” Gillen said. “Then again, I almost married Demi
Moore.”
Well, not really. He came a lot closer to beating the Cyclones.
No wonder that when Furman came to town Wednesday night that coach Larry Davis
smelled an upset. The coach sensed Virginia was tired and flat.
“Players are human,” Davis said. “I’m sure they looked out there and said, ‘It’s
Furman,’ and expected to roll over us. Virginia had played a tough schedule and
to lose a heartbreaker at Iowa State and come back wasn’t an easy thing to do.”
Davis believed that the way to upset an ACC team, particularly on that team’s
home court, was to play just well enough to hang around. And if it’s still close
at the end, then he believed he had just enough guys who could light it up from
3-point land, to get the job done.
Furman did hit 11 treys, but thanks to Virginia’s defense, only four of them
came in the second half as the Cavs erased any chance of Furman cheating the
reaper on this evening.
To make matters worse, Virginia’s star scoring machine Devin Smith, who had
drilled in 40 points at Iowa State, didn’t practice in the day between games.
The morning of the game, he was in the hot tub, getting treatments on his stiff
back.
After drilling in 11 of 18 shots, including four treys out in the cornfields of
Iowa, Smith was a mere 4 of 14 (0-5 from bonusphere) at home against Furman. It
didn’t take Dick Tracy to figure that one out.
So, as Davis and other coaches have said this season, give Gillen credit for
being the survivor. A coach who could have been fired at the end of last season,
he has his team, picked eighth in the ACC preseason poll, ranked in the top 25.
Yeah, it’s only eight games into the schedule, but who would have guessed 7-1?
And, by the way, the guy who is responsible for that poorly put together early
schedule, botched it again. The Cavaliers play only one game in a 25-day period
between beating Furman and hosting No. 6 Wake Forest at University Hall on Jan.
2.
With friends like that, who needs enemies?
Roth Report juices Hokies, riles Cavaliers
Powell Valley QB worth a I-AA look at least
By Doug Doughty
THE ROANOKE TIMES
VIRGINIA TECH radio voice Bill Roth may have subconsciously fanned the flames of
the Virginia-Virginia Tech rivalry with something he has written.
In the Kroger Roth Report that appeared on hokiesports.com, Roth wrote, “The
Hokies won an outright ACC championship during their first year in the
conference. That's a feat Tech's in-state neighbor to the north has never
accomplished in 52 seasons. For the record, it took Tech 12 weeks.”
Those two sentences, appearing in the 15th paragraph of Roth’s column, suddenly
were being used in e-mail messages by Tech students and other Hokie supporters.
This, of course, infuriated UVa fans who felt it was a cheap shot for Roth to
glorify Tech by demeaning the Cavaliers, particularly since it was the support
of UVa president John Casteen that got them into the ACC.
Roth, eager for the mention in Notebook Plus, indicated that his greatest
concern was that his sponsor be mentioned.
“Make sure you get it right, K-R-O-G-E-R,” Roth wrote in an e-mail. “Always
good, always fresh, always Kroger ... your total value leader!”
IF ROTH WAS public enemy No. 1 in Charlottesville this week, former Roanoke
Times sports editor Bill Brill continues to fill that role in Blacksburg.
Brill said he was not at home Saturday following the Tech-Miami game, when calls
started coming in from Tech fans. His biggest regret was the uglingess that
callers showered on Brill’s wife, never a party to the Tech-UVa rivalry, who had
just come home from a visit to an elderly aunt.
Not surprisingly, Brill isn’t too happy with me for bringing to light his “Tech
won’t win an ACC championshiop in my lifetime” comment.
AMONG THE FIVE players taking official visits to Virginia Tech this weekend are
two who already have committed, tight end Ed Wang from Stone Bridge in Loudoun
County and quarterback Ike Whitaker from Northwest High School in Germantown,
Md.
Uncommitted players who will be in Blacksburg are running back-defensive back
Victor “Macho” Harris from Highland Springs, quarterback Greg Boone from Oscar
Smith in Chesapeake and defensive tackle Jeff Owens (6-2, 270) from Plantation,
Fla.
Owens was rated the No. 17 prospect in Florida before the season, earning him
SuperPrep preseason All-America recognition, the same as Harris and Boone.
Harris is rated the No. 1 prospect in Virginia and Tech is considered his
prohibitive favorite.
Harris was the only uncommitted prospect to visit Virginia last week, not
surprising considering the Cavaliers have received 24 commitments -- one under
the NCAA limit. However, it appears that UVa has changed its strategy from 2003,
when most of its top uncommitted prospects had visits coinciding with the team
banquet in early December.
Now, it appears than Jan. 21 will mark the Cavaliers’ biggest recruiting
weekend. That’s the weekend when five committed players from New Jersey will be
on campus, where they tentatively will be joined by uncommitted Bergen Catholic
linebacker Brian Cushing.
Several Internet sites are reporting that new South Carolina coach Steve
Spurrier is making a push for Southern Durham, N.C., wide receiver Brandon
Woods, who committed to UVa this summer. Hampton coach Mike Smith said another
UVa receiver target, Todd Nolen, plans to visit Tech, Penn State, North Carolina
and Virginia.
IT WAS INTERESTING to read a news release from HeismanProjection.com, which, by
Wednesday, had ballot information from 154 voters, or roughly 17 percent of the
eligible voters.
Southern Cal quarterback Matt Leinart had received 25.1 percent of the vote and
HeismanProjection.com was close to projecting him as the winner.
Oklahoma running back Adrian Peterson was next at 21.6, followed by Sooners
quarterback and reigning Heisman winner Jason White at 15.1, Southern Cal
running back Reggie Bush at 14.5 and Utah quarterback Alex Smith at 13.4.
Among the voters is 2002 Heisman winner and Southern Cal alumnus Carson Palmer,
now quarterbacking the Cincinnati Bengals, who said he voted Leinart first, Bush
second and Southern Cal wide receiver Dwayne Jarrett third.
What the online service found is that Palmer was the exception, not the rule. Of
the first 30 ballots that had Leinart, first, 21 had either Peterson or White
second. Players were paired more commonly by position (Leinart-White or
Peterson-Bush) than by school.
IN THE MEDIA: During the same five-day period in which I visited my 40th state,
Iowa, (by plane, no less) I experienced another milestone when I made the
acquaintance of Coalfield Progress sportswriter Coy Bays.
Bays was a longtime runningmate of Roanoke sportswriter Nappy King on the NASCAR
circuit (“closed many a hospitality room with him,” Bays said) and was at the
Bristol Herald-Courier in its golden era, when he teamed with current Roanoke
prep editor Robert Anderson and Gannett chain heavyweight Bill Vilona, now in
Pensacola, Fla.
Throw in Bucky Dent, who later joined the Bristol staff by way of Richlands, and
that’s a lot of journalistic firepower at one paper. If I’m not mistaken,
would-be congressman Kevin Triplett once served on that staff, although I’m much
more partial to Anderson’s politics than Triplett’s.
IN ACCEPTING an assignment to cover the Group A Division 2 semifinal between
Giles and Powell Valley, the setting for my meeting with Bays, I was eager to
get a look at Powell Valley quarterback Brad Robbins, son of illustrious Powell
Valley coach Phil Robbins.
Robbins, a 6-foot-3, 215-pound left-hander, had passed for 2,500 yards and 33
touchdowns through 12 games, but his only offer, from Coastal Carolina, had been
for baseball. Phil Robbins said after the game, however, that his son was
interested by the possibility of playing college football.
Apparently, Brad Robbins battled a weight problem when he was younger and some
might question his speed, but don’t say he can’t run the ball. Robbins
frequently took off upfield against Giles and, while he didn’t pull away from
anybody, he didn’t mind running them over. He finished with 356 yards (250
passing, 106 rushing).
Phil Robbins said that VMI is interested in Vikings’ running back and linebacker
Patrick McKinney (6-3, 210) and that the interest is mutual. To me, Robbins is
capable of playing quarterback in a Division I-AA offense tailored to his
strengths; he certainly has the arm strength and the smarts to get the job done.
VIRGINIA STUDENT BOWL TRIP PACKAGE
Bogus Basin Ski Resort Info Bogus Basin Ski Resort Rules & Tips
Virginia students looking to attend the MPC Computers Bowl in Boise, Idaho now
have another option available to them with a bus trip offered by the Virginia
Department of Athletics.
Abbott Trailways is holding a 54 passenger bus for a departure on December 23,
time TBD. Charlottesville to Boise, ID is approximately 2,400 miles and they
estimate a 45 hour trip driving straight through. Depending on road conditions,
this should put the group in Boise sometime on the 25th. Abbott will provide a
transfer to the game, and is scheduled to depart Boise immediately after the
game on Dec. 27. The bus will return straight through to Charlottesville to
arrive back late afternoon or early evening on the 29th (depending on road
conditions). The driver will stop every two to three hours for meals and to
stretch.
Ruling could allow ACC replay
Swofford wants schools ready to consider it for football
KEN TYSIAC
Raleigh Bureau
Commissioner John Swofford hopes the ACC will have an opportunity to seriously
consider using instant replay to aid its game officials in football.
The ACC must wait for a ruling from the NCAA football rules committee, which
gave the Big Ten permission to experiment with replay in 2004.
Swofford said the committee could approve replay for any conference that chooses
to use it, or allow for more experimentation. That ruling could come from the
committee's meeting in February, and Swofford wants ACC coaches and
administrators to be ready to consider replay.
He will mention replay next week at a meeting of ACC administrators in
Greensboro, Swofford told the Observer Friday.
"I'm sure we'll have a serious discussion about it in February when we meet with
our athletics directors and faculty representatives," Swofford said. "I'll be
asking our ADs to have conversations with their individual coaches prior to that
meeting."
ACC officiating coordinator Tommy Hunt said in late October that he is in favor
of replay. He said ACC officials are experienced and competent, but acknowledged
that perfection is virtually impossible.
"If we make a mistake, nobody wants to see it corrected any more than us," Hunt
said.
N.C. State athletics director Lee Fowler said cost could be an issue because
cameras would have to be put in place for games that aren't televised. Some
schools already have cameras for their live video boards, but Fowler said those
might not be sufficient for use by game officials.
Swofford said it cost the Big Ten about $250,000 to get replay set up.
"I don't think that's cost prohibitive by any means," he said.
Wake Forest coach Jim Grobe said during the season that he would favor quick
checks to get calls correct, but didn't want to ruin the game's flow.
Fowler wants to review the results of the Big Ten's replay experiment before
forming an opinion. Clemson athletics director Terry Don Phillips said there are
plusses and minuses to replay, and he is concerned about lengthening games.
"To incorporate something like that, understanding that it can lengthen the
game, there has to be a significant upside to it and not just a marginal
upside," Phillips said.
Swofford said Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany and the Big Ten's coaches and
athletics directors were pleased with replay.
In 57 games with replay, there were 44 stoppages for review and 21 calls
overturned. The average length of a replay game was 3 hours, 16 minutes. The
average length of games in 2003 before replay was 3:12.
Big Ten director of communications Scott Chipman said Friday the conference
won't have any official comment on replay for another week or two. But reactions
from Big Ten coaches generally have been positive.
Michigan coach Lloyd Carr called replay an "unqualified success" last month and
predicted that replay is here to stay. Michigan State coach John L. Smith
predicted that other leagues would begin using replay.
"I think the game is moving so darn fast that I think the officials want it,"
Smith said, "and I think it's been good."
In the Big Ten's version of replay, a "technical adviser" in a replay booth was
responsible for stopping games to review plays and had sole authority to change
a call.
Replay could overturn plays governed by the sideline, goal line, end zone and
end line; various elements of the passing game (complete, incomplete, etc.), and
other elements, such as forward progress with regard to a first down and the
number of players on the field.
"What the Big Ten did was not like the NFL," Swofford said. "It was much less
intrusive and obviously considerably less expensive, but it does give you the
opportunity to take a second look at plays that might be questionable."
Virginia coach Al Groh, formerly the New York Jets' coach, said during the
season that he favored replay in the NFL and favors it in college, at least to
help determine possession of the ball and whether a score occurred.
"There's so many people who put so much into determining those two things, that
for that to be distorted through understandable human error that is correctable
is kind of a shame," Groh said.